Topic: Fujitsu – developing early-career project managers
7 pages length – Times New Roman 12, APA 7 format
Sheet1
| MSITM 6320 AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT – CASE ANALYSIS RUBRIC | |||||||||
| SNO | Criteria | Requirements | Weight | Score | Excellent (5) | Good (4) | Fair (3) | Poor (2) | Fail (0) |
| 1 | Identification of the main issues and/or problems. | 3-5 issues and/or problems. | 10% | Identifies and understands all the main issues in the case study. | Identifies and understands most of the main issues in the case study. | Identifies and understands some of the main issues in the case study. | Identifies and understands few of the main issues in the case study. | Failed to turn in assignments on time / did not understand any main issues in the case study | |
| 2 | Literature research & review. | Majority (at least 60% or higher) of articles and/or references must be within last 10 years. | 15% | Excellent research with clearly documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts and good (3 or more) use of corroborating sources | Good research and documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts and some (2 or more) use of corroborating sources. | Limited research and associations between the problems or questions and key course concepts and little (1 or more) use of corroborating sources. | Incomplete research and associations between the problems or questions and key course concepts and no use of corroborating | Failed to turnin assignments on time / conducted no research | |
| 3 | Analysis of the key issues. | All issues must be analyzed. | 25% | Insightful and thorough analysis of all the key issues. | Insightful and thorough analysis of most of the key issues. | Insightful and thorough analysis of some of the key issues. | Incomplete analysis of the key issues. | Failed to turnin assignments on time / did not conduct analyis | |
| 4 | Alternative solutions and/or options. | Provide method of comparison between alternatives. | 20% | Alternatives cover all the key issues with method to evaluate all equally. | Alternatives cover most of the key issues with method to evaluate. | Alternatives cover some of the key issues with method to evaluate. | Incomplete analysis of alternatives with no evaluation method. | Failed to turnin assignments on time /no alternatives proposed | |
| 5 | Observations and/or recommendations on effective solutions. | Include short-term and long-term recommendations; Included should be realistic time frames, designation of roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders and an appropriate evaluation program. | 20% | Well-reasoned, logical, relevant observations and recommendations on effective solutions to most of the problems/issues. | Solid, well-thought out observations and recommendations on effective solutions to many of the problems/issues. | Shallow observations and recommendations on effective solutions to some of the problems/issues. | Superficial observations and recommendations on effective solutions to a few of the problems/issues. | Failed to turn in assignments on time / no recommendations provided | |
| 6 | Writing Skills/Professional Presentation. | Includes overall composition, structure, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. | 10% | Writing is totally free of grammar and spelling errors. Clear, concise and creative presentation of ideas and properly referenced. | There are few spelling or grammatical errors. Most ideas are clearly presented and references are used. | There are several spelling or grammatical errors. Some ideas are clearly presented. References are sporadic or not used | There are many spelling errors and grammatical mistakes. Ideas are hard to follow. References are not used. | Failed to turn in assignments on time /unstructured with too may errors and with no references | |
| TOTAL | 100% |
