four (4) important insights gained into organizational dynamics, and how you have or will apply them to enhance your leadership effectiveness. A well-constructed paper will reference 4 or more scholarly sources including 3 peer-reviewed journal articles retrieved from Brandman’s virtual library, and adhere to APA standards.
As outlined in the rubric below, your paper should address the following:
- Use course theories and concepts to identify 4 significant insights gained into organizational dynamics that has changed your behavior and/or thinking; define and discuss the value and importance of the theories and concepts to leadership effectiveness.
- Assess your current effectiveness as a leader, and describe how and why the application of the insights gained will improve your leadership practice.
- Create a specific action plan based on the insights gained from course theories and concepts to improve your leadership effectiveness.
OLCU 613 Week 8: Leadership Effectiveness Application Paper – Assignment and Rubric
Online Requirements
Length: Paper: 6 – 7 double-spaced pages (excluding title and references pages)
Due: Week 8 by Wednesday Midnight
Value: 200 Points for 20% of the grade
Post: Week 8 Assignments — Turnitin
Leadership Effectiveness Application Paper Guidelines
Prepare a 6 – 7 page paper that identifies four (4) important insights gained into organizational dynamics, and how you have or will apply them to enhance your leadership effectiveness. A well-constructed paper will reference 4 or more scholarly sources including 3 peer-reviewed journal articles retrieved from Brandman’s virtual library, and adhere to APA standards.
As outlined in the rubric below, your paper should address the following:
· Use course theories and concepts to identify 4 significant insights gained into organizational dynamics that has changed your behavior and/or thinking; define and discuss the value and importance of the theories and concepts to leadership effectiveness.
· Assess your current effectiveness as a leader, and describe how and why the application of the insights gained will improve your leadership practice.
· Create a specific action plan based on the insights gained from course theories and concepts to improve your leadership effectiveness.
Evaluation Criteria
Criteria |
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Developing |
Emerging |
No credit |
|
Theoretical Framework |
50 – 46 Clearly and concisely identifies and reflects in-depth on 4 important insights gained from course theories and concepts that have or could enhance leadership effectiveness; links 4 insights to course theories and concepts discussing how and why behavior and/or thinking has changed |
45 – 41 Clearly identifies and reflects on 3 – 4 insights gained from course theories and concepts that have or could enhance leadership effectiveness; links 3 – 4 insights to course theories and concepts somewhat discussing how and why behavior and/or thinking has changed |
40 – 36 Somewhat clearly identifies 2 – 4 insights gained that have or could enhance leadership effectiveness but may not reflect on value. May not connect 1 insight to course concepts. Description of how course theories and concepts have changed behavior and/or thinking may be superficial |
35 – 0 May identify 1 – 4 insights which may not be connected to course theories and/or concepts. Limited if any reflection and/or discussion of how course theories and concepts have changed behavior and/or thinking |
0 Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted. |
|
Application to Leadership Practice |
50 – 46 Comprehensively assesses current leadership effectiveness, and creates a specific action plan to integrate the 4 insights to improve leadership practice discussing how and why the actions planned are appropriate. |
45 – 41 Assesses current leadership effectiveness, and creates a fairly specific action plan to apply 3 – 4 insights to improve leadership practice discussing how and why the actions planned are appropriate. |
40 – 36 Somewhat assesses current leadership and creates a general action plan to apply 2 – 4 insights to improve leadership practice. May not discuss how and why the actions planned are appropriate. |
35 – 0 Limited if any discussion of actions to apply insights to leadership practice. May not assess current leadership effectiveness or discuss how to enhance it. |
Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted. |
|
Critical Analysis |
50 – 46 Consistently employs critical analysis in creating an effective action plan that synthesizes and integrates insights gained, course theories and concepts, and actions planned to improve leadership practice. |
45 – 41 Fairly consistently employs critical analysis in creating an action plan to apply insights gained, course theories and concepts, and actions planned to improve leadership practice |
40 – 36 Some critical analysis in discusses general actions planned to enhance leadership practice but may not link actions to insights gained and/or course theories and concepts. |
35 – 0 Limited if any critical analysis in discussing actions planned to enhance leadership practice; does not link actions to insights gained and/or course theories and concepts. |
Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted. |
|
APA and Sources |
20 – 19 Uses 4 or more scholarly sources including 3 journal articles. Accurately adheres to APA standards; reference page and citations are correct. All sources listed in References are cited in paper |
18 – 17 Uses 4 scholarly sources including 3 journal articles. . Adheres to APA standards; reference page and citations are correct with minor (1-3) errors. . All sources listed in References are cited in paper |
16 – 15 Uses 3 – 4 sources including 2 – 3 journal articles. APA standards are somewhat followed; the work of others is cited but with numerous (4 – 10) errors. Sources listed in References and citations may not match |
14 – 0 Uses 0 – 4 sources. Limited adherence to APA standards in the paper and Reference page; work of others may be cited but with multiple (11+) errors. Sources listed in References and citations do not match |
Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted. |
|
Writing Mechanics |
30 – 28 The paper is logical and well-written; spelling, grammar and punctuation are accurate. Paper is the required length of 6 – 7 pages of content, and includes correctly prepared title page. |
27 – 26 The paper is logical and well-written but with minor (1 – 3) errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content may be 5% too long or short; includes a correctly prepared title page. |
25 – 22 The paper is somewhat logical and well-written but with several (4 – 10) errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content may be 10% too long or short, and may not include a correctly prepared title page |
21- 0 The paper lacks clarity and may be confusing; may contain numerous (11+) errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation. The content may be 15% too long or short, and may not include a title page |
Assignment, meeting grading criteria, was not submitted. |
OLCU 613 Week 8: Leadership Effectiveness Application Paper – Assignment and Rubric JJ vfall2018
